Comments on: Google UI update - search within search http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101 TallTroll SPEAKS! Negative SEO musings, industry comment and SmallTroll Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:37:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Andy http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-95478 Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:50:48 +0000 http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-95478 I am seeing it on oxford I am seeing it on oxford

]]> by: SEO http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-93825 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:49:19 +0000 http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-93825 lol you rank well for Asda in Cambridge i was looking for. lol you rank well for Asda in Cambridge i was looking for.

]]> by: AndrĂ© Scholten http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-93392 Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:17:12 +0000 http://www.seoassassin.co.uk/blog/archives/101#comment-93392 And why do they want to give you another search box in their search results? If I create a new site Google tells me to noindex the search results of that site, they don't want that users get a search result page after their search result page.... and now they do it themselves. And couldn't they serve the most relevant page rightaway in stead of presenting a second search box? I agree with you: they talk shit :) And why do they want to give you another search box in their search results? If I create a new site Google tells me to noindex the search results of that site, they don’t want that users get a search result page after their search result page…. and now they do it themselves.

And couldn’t they serve the most relevant page rightaway in stead of presenting a second search box?

I agree with you: they talk shit :)

]]>